The House Rules

Read them once. Live by them.

I. Why These Exist

The Parlor runs on trust between adults who already know how to behave. These rules are not a substitute for that. They are a clear statement of what the room expects, so that there is no confusion when something goes wrong.

The community polices itself first. References, vouches, attendance, attention paid: these are how Members tell each other who is welcome at the next event. The platform supports; the community decides. Where the platform is needed, the platform acts.

When in doubt, the test is simple. Would the adult version of you, reading this five years from now, be comfortable with what you are about to do? If not, do not do it.

II. Discretion

Discretion is the floor. It is not a feature, not a request, and not a preference. It is what the Parlor is.

What happens here belongs here. Members do not take screenshots of conversations and post them elsewhere. Members do not name the Parlor in public spaces without consideration of what they reveal by doing so. Members do not tell other adults' stories without their permission. The lifestyle community has always required this; the platform requires it as well.

If a Member is recognized off-platform by another Member, both Members hold the recognition discreetly. You do not approach a Member you recognize from the Parlor in a setting where they have not opted into being recognized. If you are uncertain whether a setting counts, treat it as off-platform and stay quiet.

Discretion violations are taken seriously. A confirmed pattern of indiscretion results in standing penalties, suspension, or termination, depending on severity.

III. Consent

Consent is the first thing we ask of each other. Not the last.

Asking is not weakness, and assuming is not confidence. The community attracts adults who have learned this distinction; the platform exists to serve that community. If you are unclear on what consent looks like in lifestyle, ENM, polyamory, or kink contexts, the Library has primer articles, and the community has been generous with newcomers who ask in good faith.

Consent is specific. Consenting to one thing is not consenting to another. Consenting to one Member is not consenting to that Member's partner, friend, or guest. Consenting at one event is not consenting at the next. Members who treat consent as a one-time door rather than an ongoing conversation are not welcome in this room.

Consent can be withdrawn at any time, and the withdrawal is binding. If a Member withdraws consent in real time, in advance, or after the fact, the other Members involved respect it without negotiation.

Coercion of any kind, whether through pressure, intoxication, leverage, status, or repeated insistence after a decline, ends a membership. We do not negotiate this.

IV. Conduct

The community holds Members to adult standards of behavior. We do not require politeness; we require care.

The conduct expectations on the platform vary by user type, and we are direct about that. Men are held to a higher bar of restraint and care than women, because the consequences of bad behavior in this community fall harder on the women who endure them. Men who cannot meet that bar are not in trouble. They are simply not in the right room.

Persistent messaging after a decline, soft or otherwise, is harassment. One first message is welcome from any Member who can see another Member's profile. Two becomes a pattern. The platform tracks first-message-to-reply ratios and flags accounts whose pattern suggests volume over consideration.

Showing up to events without a confirmed RSVP, or attempting to gain access to events outside your standing tier, is treated as a serious violation. The trust ladder exists precisely to prevent this; circumventing it is a category mistake about what kind of community this is.

Bigotry, including racism, body-shaming, kink-shaming, and hostility toward queer or trans Members, ends a membership. The lifestyle community has always been more diverse than the public assumes, and the Parlor reflects that. Members who cannot share a room with that fact are not Members.

V. Photos and Media

Every photo uploaded to the Parlor is invisibly watermarked and tied to your account. If a photo appears off-platform without consent, we can identify it, and we will. Photo theft is treated as a serious violation, both against the Member whose photo it is and against the room at large.

Members do not save other Members' photos off-platform without explicit permission. Members do not share other Members' photos with non-Members. Members do not screenshot the directory, profile pages, or messages and circulate them anywhere. The platform's discretion features only work if the Members on it cooperate; we cooperate.

Members are responsible for what they upload. Photos containing other identifiable adults require those adults' consent. Photos that violate the consent or privacy of others, including ex-partners, are removed and the uploading Member faces consequences.

VI. Reports and Concerns

The Parlor offers two channels for raising issues, and they are not the same.

A Report

A lightweight flag. You have noticed something that needs review. A profile photo that violates the rules. A message that crosses a line. An event description that misrepresents what attendees should expect. Reports go to the moderation team, are reviewed within hours, and result in a moderator decision. Reports do not affect the subject's standing on their own; they simply route the matter for review.

A Concern

A heavier complaint about a Member's pattern of behavior. It is appropriate when a Member is acting in ways that warrant the community's attention rather than a single moderator's decision. Concerns are filed with detail, are reviewed by senior moderation, and follow a formal process.

The Concern process is subject-aware. A Member who is the subject of a Concern is told what the Concern is, in summary, and given seven days to respond before a decision is rendered. This is deliberate. Black-box moderation breaks the trust premise; transparent moderation, even when uncomfortable, builds it.

Reporter identity is protected by default. The subject of a Concern knows what was claimed about them; they do not know who claimed it, unless the moderator determines disclosure is essential and the reporter consents.

VII. Consequences

The platform applies consequences proportionate to the severity of the conduct. We are direct about the bands.

Minor. A standing penalty without suspension. The Member is informed and the matter is logged. Examples include a single instance of pushy messaging, a minor discretion lapse, an event-rules misunderstanding.

Moderate. A standing penalty plus discoverability restriction for a defined period. The Member remains on the platform but is less visible to others while the period runs. Examples include repeated discretion lapses, persistent messaging after decline, behavior at events that other Members reported.

Serious. Suspension of access, typically thirty to ninety days, after which the Member returns at one tier lower and rebuilds their standing. Examples include confirmed photo misuse, hostile conduct, or behavior at events that endangered other Members.

Severe. Termination of the account. Reserved for predatory behavior, coercion, repeated serious misconduct, or any conduct that the community cannot absorb without harm. Termination is final. The platform may also share appropriate information with venues, partner platforms, or law enforcement when warranted.

Severity is determined by humans, not by formula alone. The platform records behavioral signals (first-message-to-reply ratios, RSVP no-show rates, pattern of declined approaches, withdrawn vouches) which inform moderation but do not replace moderator judgment.

VIII. Appeals

Every moderation decision is appealable within thirty days. Appeals route to a moderator different from the one who made the original decision; severe consequences route to senior staff.

Appeals can uphold the original decision, modify it, or reverse it entirely. Outcomes are communicated to the Member with reasoning. The platform takes its own decisions seriously enough to allow them to be challenged, and the community is better served by transparent reconsideration than by infallibility theater.

A Member whose appeal is denied may not file a second appeal on the same matter. A Member whose conduct continues to warrant moderation after an unsuccessful appeal does not get a second chance to relitigate the original decision.

IX. Platform Liability

After Dark Parlor is an interactive computer service under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This means the platform is not the publisher or speaker of what members post, send, or say here. Members are responsible for their own content and conduct. The platform actively moderates content and removes material that violates our Community Standards. Active moderation is consistent with and does not waive the platform's Section 230 protections.

The platform does not have Section 230 protection for content that promotes or facilitates sex trafficking, consistent with the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act. If you encounter such content, report it immediately.

X. How the Room Takes Care of Itself

Most of what keeps the Parlor a good room does not happen on this page. It happens in the references Members write about each other. It happens in the events Members attend, host, and recommend. It happens in the introductions made privately, between Members who know what each other can be trusted with. The platform's role is to support that work, to surface its signals, and to act when the community needs the platform to act.

If you have made it this far, you are the kind of Member the Parlor was built for. Welcome.